<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>optoblog.com &#187; suppliers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.optoblog.com/tag/suppliers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.optoblog.com</link>
	<description>Personal Opinion Blog of David Langford</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" - maintenance_release="8.8.5.3" -->
	<copyright>2005-2010 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>editor@optoblog.com (David Langford, O.D.)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>editor@optoblog.com (David Langford, O.D.)</webMaster>
	<category>Optometry</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle>OPTOBLOG&#62;COM is an optometry news blog- info related to optometric research, equipment, products, and practice.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Optometry News Blog- info related to optometric research, equipment, products, and practice.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>Optometrist, Optometry, vision, eye, ophthalmic, ophthalmology, optometric, practice, Walmart</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Science &#38; Medicine">
		<itunes:category text="Medicine" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Health" />
	<itunes:category text="Business">
		<itunes:category text="Management &#38; Marketing" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>David Langford, O.D.</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>David Langford, O.D.</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>editor@optoblog.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.optoblog.com/images/optobloglogo300.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>The Break Even Point</title>
		<link>http://www.optoblog.com/2008/04/09/the-break-even-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.optoblog.com/2008/04/09/the-break-even-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Langford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optoblog.com/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Independent Urologist has an excellent post about surviving your first 1-2 years of private practice, should you be insane enough to try. I think he makes a great point, you need much more money in working capitol than capitol equipment. That was part of my problem, I ran out of money, had to get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://theindependenturologist.blogspot.com/2008/04/reader-question-how-long-to-positive.html">Independent Urologist</a> has an excellent post about surviving your first 1-2 years of private practice, should you be insane enough to try.  I think he makes a great point, you need much more money in working capitol than capitol equipment.  That was part of my problem, I ran out of money, had to get a job 4 days a week outside the practice just to pay the bills, and that left much less time available to grow my own practice.</p>
<p>My financing company wouldn&#8217;t give me very much money as working capitol.  They capped it as a percentage of the total loan.  You&#8217;ll note that a urologist has less equipment costs than an optometrist with an optical.  If I were to do it again, I would find out all the companies like Altair that give you frames on consignment.  I also wouldn&#8217;t buy fancy digital phoropters and Officemate Exam Writer.  I would go cheap as possible on everything- bootstrap.  That&#8217;s the only way you&#8217;ll survive until the break even point.</p>
<p>And I wouldn&#8217;t hire a practice consultant that takes $13,000 of your borrowed money either.  Practice consultants will make you think that if you build it, they will come.  It&#8217;s pretty expensive flavor-aid to be drinking.  You&#8217;ll get all the information you need from internet searches and free resources like the <a href="http://www.mba-ce.com/">Management and Business Academy</a>.  Also, a good buying group like <a href="http://www.cevision.com/">C&#038;E Vision</a> has excellent resources to help you see what numbers you should be putting up.</p>
<p>By the way, did you know Wal-Mart docs have the <a href="http://www.oba-ce.com/">Optometric Business Academy</a>?  I hope that you didn&#8217;t really think that vendors (like Ciba, Essilor, Topcon, and Transitions) only look out for private practice docs.</p>
<p>Also the IU notes that while he now has a positive cash flow, he estimates that he has lost ~$200,000 in income by starting up his own practice.  If you start off practicing in Wal-Mart, then you have income from the get-go.  I know of doctors working for other optometrists for ~$50-60K pre tax salary for a few years with the hope of buying into the practice.  Even if they are allowed to eventually buy in, what about all the income lost?  They could have been making $120K+ pre tax net while working with Wal-Mart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.optoblog.com/2008/04/09/the-break-even-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stinking Glasses</title>
		<link>http://www.optoblog.com/2007/10/09/stinking-glasses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.optoblog.com/2007/10/09/stinking-glasses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Langford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppliers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optoblog.com/2007/10/09/stinking-glasses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what I wish I could say to patients when they ask about private practice glasses prices. Do you ever feel like we&#8217;re being sold out by the very lens companies that say they&#8217;re looking out for us? For example, Wal-Mart sells lenses for cheaper than I can buy them from my lab. How [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.optoblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/optoblog-comic-016-glasses-and-poop.png' alt='Stinking Glasses - optoblog cartoon #16' /></p>
<p>This is what I wish I could say to patients when they ask about private practice glasses prices.  Do you ever feel like we&#8217;re being sold out by the very lens companies that say they&#8217;re looking out for us?  For example, Wal-Mart sells lenses for cheaper than I can buy them from my lab.  How does that happen?</p>
<p>What if a whole bunch of private practices started a co-op lab so that all profits from the lab go to the doctors?  Or is <a href="http://www.redtrayoptical.com/">Red Tray Optical</a> the answer?</p>
<p>I like the consignment deal that <a href="http://www.vsp.com/vspcom_doctor/html/doctor_home.jsp">VSP</a> offers with their line of glasses.  Why should I have to pay for frames that haven&#8217;t sold?  Since frames now days look so <a href="http://www.optoblog.com/2007/03/16/trendy-glasses/">freaking wacked</a>, I think all frame vendors should work on consignment.</p>
<p>All I know is that doctors seem to be getting the short end of the stick while the frame and lens makers are assured their cash.  I don&#8217;t see a profit motive for Big Lenses to help out private practice docs since commercial makes them more money overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.optoblog.com/2007/10/09/stinking-glasses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
