<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>optoblog.com &#187; LinkGate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.optoblog.com/tag/linkgate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.optoblog.com</link>
	<description>Personal Opinion Blog of David Langford</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.optoblog.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
	<copyright>2005-2010 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>editor@optoblog.com (David Langford, O.D.)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>editor@optoblog.com (David Langford, O.D.)</webMaster>
	<category>Optometry</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle>OPTOBLOG&#62;COM is an optometry news blog- info related to optometric research, equipment, products, and practice.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Optometry News Blog- info related to optometric research, equipment, products, and practice.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>Optometrist, Optometry, vision, eye, ophthalmic, ophthalmology, optometric, practice, Walmart</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Science &#38; Medicine">
		<itunes:category text="Medicine" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Health" />
	<itunes:category text="Business">
		<itunes:category text="Management &#38; Marketing" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>David Langford, O.D.</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>David Langford, O.D.</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>editor@optoblog.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.optoblog.com/images/optobloglogo300.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Link Gate Update: No Revenue from Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.optoblog.com/2008/11/01/link-gate-update-no-revenue-from-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.optoblog.com/2008/11/01/link-gate-update-no-revenue-from-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 05:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Langford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Optoblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkGate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optoblog.com/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who remember Link Gate on my practice website, you&#8217;ll remember that my response to criticism of linking to Wal-Mart.com was, &#8220;Why link for free when I can sign up to earn ad revenue from 1-800 CONTACTS link referrals?&#8221; Some outfit called Commission Junction handles the details for 1-800&#8242;s referral program, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who remember <a href="http://www.optoblog.com/2008/05/19/link-gate/">Link Gate</a> on my <a href="http://www.visionhealtheye.com/">practice website</a>, you&#8217;ll remember that my response to criticism of linking to Wal-Mart.com was, &#8220;Why link for free when I can sign up to earn ad revenue from 1-800 CONTACTS link referrals?&#8221;<a href="http://www.jdoqocy.com/click-3024627-10378030"><img src="http://www.ftjcfx.com/image-3024627-10378030" alt="$40 savings on Acuvue Oasys lens, save now!" align="right"/></a></p>
<p>Some outfit called Commission Junction handles the details for 1-800&#8242;s referral program, and I got this email from them today:</p>
<blockquote><p>You are receiving this email because we are concerned that your Commission Junction publisher account has not generated any valid commissions (from payable transactions) recently. We encourage you to begin earning commissions as quickly as possible. Otherwise, your publisher account is at risk of deactivation due to dormancy&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>So for the one guy who started Link Gate, let me assure you that no one cares that I link to 1-800 or Wal-Mart since apparently no one follows the links anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.optoblog.com/2008/11/01/link-gate-update-no-revenue-from-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Link Gate</title>
		<link>http://www.optoblog.com/2008/05/19/link-gate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.optoblog.com/2008/05/19/link-gate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 07:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Langford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Optoblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkGate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optoblog.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So when I first announced that I was going to shift the focus of this blog to be pro Wal-Mart and tell people about my experiences in this setting (which I will someday get around to), I was flooded with spiteful comments. The first thing one commenter, &#8220;John Smith,&#8221; did was to try and dig [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when I first announced that I was going to shift the focus of this blog to be pro Wal-Mart and tell people about my experiences in this setting (which I will someday get around to), I was flooded with spiteful comments.  The first thing <a href="http://www.optoblog.com/2008/04/08/the-most-hated-optometrist-in-america/#comment-16893">one commenter, &#8220;John Smith,&#8221;</a> did was to try and dig up dirt on me and report me to the Utah optometric board.</p>
<p>On my <a href="http://visionhealtheye.com">VisionHealth EyeCare</a> practice website, he saw that I linked to Wal-Mart.com&#8217;s contact lens sales section.  He (mistakenly) believes this to be in violation of Utah law and (if he can be believed) filed a complaint to the board.</p>
<p>Let me quote the allegation that &#8220;John Smith&#8221; made:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the state of Utah, optometrists are strictly prohibited from marketing or advertising for the mercantile establishment. This includes websites.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t know how they do things in Virginia, Ru-I mean &#8220;John Smith,&#8221; but here in Utah we have no such rule.  I could see such crazy rules coming out of communist states like California or even psychotic-optometry-rule states like Nevada, but not in a freedom-loving, gun-and-God-clinging state.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.optoblog.com/2008/01/29/optoblog-update-to-wal-mart-and-1-800-contacts/#comment-16952">Another commenter</a> decided to sell us on 1800optometrist, which got me to thinking that hey, I&#8217;m providing those links to Wal-Mart.com for <em>free</em>.  Why not annoy R-I mean &#8220;John Smith&#8221; even more <em>and</em> potentially make some cash at the same time by linking to 1800 Contacts!?!</p>
<p>It was simple.  I found out about it while <a href="http://www.1800contacts.com/ExternalRelations/TheCompanyWebAffil.aspx">reading at 1800&#8242;s website</a>, registered, and voila&#8217;, I have cool links on my practice website for patients to conveniently order contacts and save money while doing it.  If they buy stuff, then 1800&#8242;s ad manager sends me a check to say thanks for the referral.  While I was browsing 1800contacts, I also registered for <a href="http://www.1800contacts.com/ExternalRelations/EyeCareJoin.aspx">ProNet</a> so they will send me referrals when someone&#8217;s Rx expires.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kqzyfj.com/click-3024627-10470117"><br />
<img align="right" src="http://www.awltovhc.com/image-3024627-10470117" width="300" height="250" alt="Exact same contact lenses for less." border="0"/></a>Here&#8217;s what the ads look like (and if you are by chance a non-optometrist reading this article, please click on this link the next time you need to reorder contacts):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jdoqocy.com/click-3024627-5338102"><br />
<img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/image-3024627-5338102" width="120" height="60" alt="1800Contacts.com" border="0"/></a></p>
<p>So, if you are like &#8220;John Smith&#8221; and think that I am caught in a Link Gate scandal, then here is the website for <a href="http://www.dopl.utah.gov/investigations/complaint_form.html">Utah DOPL&#8217;s complaint department</a>.  But believe me that I&#8217;ve searched all the <a href="http://www.dopl.utah.gov/licensing/optometry.html">documents found online</a> with the Utah DOPL, and John Doe&#8217;s alleged Utah rule is made up out of the same magical stuff that new grads grab onto if they want to start their own solo private practice: wishful thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.optoblog.com/2008/05/19/link-gate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

