Archive for the tag 'insurance'

There was an interesting article written at the AmateurEconomist.com about “Why Doctors Are Not Good Businessmen.”

Hat tip to Kevin, M.D. who commented on this story and said,

“This is why the private practice model of medicine is dying. More practices are being bought by hospitals where the physicians are salaried. This relieves the burden of administrative tasks and supervising ancillary staff, so that the doctor can focus on medicine.”

Rob at VSP says that “[private practice doctors] provide the best care.” Well, if I’ve got the weight of a business on my shoulders, doesn’t that detract from patient care? Additionally, in our field where the private practice doctors sell what they prescribe, can you totally rule out any conflicts of interest which potentially detract from patient care?

Again, independent doctors of optometry in a Wal-Mart setting don’t have the conflict of interest and their administrative duties are much less than private practice.

What’s funny to me is that every CE event I’ve been to always has some talk about why optometrists should start the “medical model” in their practice and watch the money role in. Well, how is adding more third party payers going to help you make more money? Primary care medicine is dying according to Kevin M.D., and yet the roboconsultants are telling us to join more insurance panels. I think getting rid of insurance companies in your practice is the way of the future.

The roboconsultant woos you buy saying that for one case of dry eye you can milk an insurance company for $500-$800 in office visits and procedures. Well, do you do that for every dry eye patient, even the poor self pay patient or the patient with insurance but poor benefits? I would think that doing it just for those with good insurance would be unethical as well as probably insurance fraud.

I think the more your appointment book is filled up, the more you should be able to charge for your services. It’s the old supply and demand of free economics. I think a better system would be for patients to have to front the money to pay the doctor for office visits at the time of service. The patient would have to get reimbursed what they can from their insurance company. Maybe then insurance companies would be forced to have a faster turn around time on processing claims for their patients and be watched more closely for just rubber stamping a denial based on some frivolous billing exercise (or at the least the patient has to worry about it instead of me.) I simply provide the best care for the patient, recommending only the products and services that they need, since now I don’t have to worry about getting paid.

Listen to this blog entry via text-to-speach with talkr.com Listen to this blog entry
David Langford

VSP Tries to Sell Private Practice

So Rob’s Blog has this to say to people about getting yearly diabetic eye exams. As if optometrists in a commercial setting don’t do the same thing, he tells a big lie here:

…these [private practice] doctors consistently have the longest relationships with their patients and provide the best care.

Rob, people aren’t buying what you’re selling anymore. I see VSP beneficiaries out of network all the time in my Wal-Mart setting. I guess they aren’t loyal to a practice setting, but rather they factor in price and convenience while assuming, correctly, that any doctor they see in my area is competent.

Oh, and I remember when Intel in the Hillsboro/Beaverton, Oregon area was buying your VSP, and then they switched to EyeMed. Does that mean they thought your private practice network of doctors couldn’t “provide the best care?”

But I see what he’s trying to do. Any roboconsultant will tell you that you need to differentiate yourself from the competition; however, I take exception when he lies.

Listen to this blog entry via text-to-speach with talkr.com Listen to this blog entry

Since it is an election year, everyone has been bringing up the high cost of health care. The liberal democrats, Clinton and Obama, are promising reforms which would inevitably fail and/or turn our country into a socialist/communist state. Then I read an article in Rush Limbaugh’s April 2008 newsletter entitled, “Health Care Diagnostics: Why Doesn’t Anyone Talk About Lower Costs?”

Rush brings up an ABC John Stossel report about Dr. Robert Berry who stopped accepting insurance, including Medicare and Medicaid. His office visits are as low as $40, yet his salary is typical of a primary care physician.

Well, I wish Rush would have also shared what hundreds of Wal-Mart optometrists do. We deliver eyecare for a fraction of the private practice fees. Private eyecare practices in my market of Cache Valley, Utah offer routine eye exams from $70-125. My Wal-Mart practice offers the same routine eye exam for $45-55.

Insurance companies have created this health care conundrum. Employers or individuals who buy into vision insurance are really getting scammed. My $45 exam is about what most vision insurances pay doctors anyway. So…why give any money to the middle man? And then there are a couple snobby vision plans that only let private practice doctors on their panels. The beneficiaries of these plans get doubly ripped off because sure, the exam might be covered, but when they want premium coatings or progressive lenses, they get stuck paying the balance over the basic lens. At private practice opticals, this balance can be more than the total price they might pay at Wal-Mart. So again, what good is paying money into this vision plan?

Buying vision insurance makes about as much sense as buying oil change insurance or hair cut insurance. The only people that win are the insurance companies, unless you got the coverage at no cost to you and can use your plan at Wal-Mart so that even if you do have to pay over a balance, at least you will get the best price.

In my former private practice my wholesale cost for lenses were just barely under the retail price of Wal-Mart lenses. As a doctor concerned about the welfare of my patients, I can’t continue to sell overly expensive products when Wal-Mart sells the equivalent premium products 30-50% less than what I could in my own optical shop.

So Rush, please add to your list of professionals doing what they can to control rising health care costs the excellent professionals at Wal-Mart Vision Centers.

Listen to this blog entry via text-to-speach with talkr.com Listen to this blog entry

FireStats icon Powered by FireStats